Presumably, though, beliefs contrary to christianity may be held by some individuals in certain circumstances as properly basic. Plantingas modal version ontological argument plantinga developed his modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of god in his two controversial books, the nature of necessity 1974. Plantingas fundamental error is in assuming that philosophy is about things. Anselm of canterbury used a version of the argument in the 11th century ad, but it has its modern defenders as well. God exists in the understanding but not in reality. Plantinga s modal version ontological argument plantinga developed his modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of god in his two controversial books, the nature of necessity 1974. The nature of necessity, together with a series of subsequent articles, constitutes what is perhaps the most sophisticated theory of possible worlds yet to be constructed. Apr 23, 2014 the ontological argument has a long history st. I have to say, i think several of the objections presented against the ontological argument basically miss the mark. Pdf where the conflict really lies download full pdf.
The evolutionary argument against naturalism eaan is a philosophical argument asserting a problem with believing both evolution and philosophical naturalism simultaneously. Critique of the ontological argument david duncombe. The ontological argument alvin plantinga 1 the third theistic argument i wish to discuss is the famous ontological argument first formulated by anselm of canterbury in the eleventh century. If the pluralist had been born in morocco he probably wouldnt be a pluralist. Many theists have claimed maydoles ontological argument from the the blackwell companion to natural theology has never been refuted, i am presenting a refutation based on and expanded from a discussion here. Oct 21, 2016 plantinga s fundamental error is in assuming that philosophy is about things. Maydole ontological arguments are deductive arguments for the existence of god from general metaphysical principles and other assumptions about the nature or essence of god. A video response to inspiringphilosphy and anticitizenx regarding alvin plantingas modal ontological argument for gods existence. Philosophy genius editors the ontological argument for. Alvin plantinga download ebook pdf, epub, tuebl, mobi. In contrast, the greater complexity of godels argument requires the formalization and automation.
Now god can create free creatures, but he cant cause or determine them to do only what is right. He spent nineteen years as a professor at calvin college, then eighteen years at the university of notre dame, and returned to calvin college in 2010. As an example of actualistically acceptable abstract worlds, we draw chiefly upon plantingas account. Critically evaluate plantingas view that kants objection to anselms ontological argument is irrelevant. It is time now to consider one motivation a believer may have for accepting a given version of the ontological argument, namely abstract objects. In warrant and proper function alvin plantinga established his evolutionary argument against naturalism1 eaan. Click download or read online button to get alvin plantinga book now.
This site is like a library, use search box in the widget to get ebook that you want. On the logic of the ontological argument stanford university. Alvin plantinga challenged this argument and proposed an alternative, based on modal logic. Patching plantingas ontological argument by making the. We examine the famous ontological argument in proslogium ii. The ontological argument from the proslogion, by anselm, bishop of canterbury c. I introduce a plausible interpretation of the ontological argument that is not vulnerable to millicans objection and conclude that even if the ontological. Unfortunately, this reformulation of the ontological argument implies the existence of possible beings which do not exist. Consequently, the modal ontological argument is a logical argument, but not an ontological argument in the sense of having any existential relevance. The argument was first proposed by alvin plantinga in 1993 and raises issues of interest to epistemologists, philosophers of mind, evolutionary biologists, and philosophers of religion. If religious belief is reasonable, then its up to a posteriori arguments design, cosmological or religious experiences to show that its also true. Plantinga begins his discussion of the ontological argument by borrowing seventeenth century philosopher leibniz idea of possible worlds. This argument obviously begs the question because it uses as a premise what. The teleological and cosmological arguments shall be first discussed, criticised by showing their reliance on the ontological argument, which shall then be shown to be an inadequate argument.
Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the worlde. However, the predicate logic of descriptions must be free, since these. Anselms ontological argument anselm, 1078 can be regarded as the ancestor of modern ontological arguments such as godels. The ontological argument for the existence of god has enjoyed a recent renaissance. Feel free to ping me in a month or three if you want to see what data ive collected. In the nature of necessity 1974a and god, freedom and evil 1974b plantinga argues, also famously, that mackies argument isnt sound.
The following video explains alvin plantingas modal ontological argument where the word modal refers to notions of possibility. Get your kindle here, or download a free kindle reading app. This is the basic idea of modal ontological analysis. In this account, we replace the possibilist idea of merely possible worlds with that of a certain type of state of affairs alternatively, a certain type of proposition which exists but fails to obtain alternatively, fails to be true. A critique of the plantinga version of the modal ontological. Reassessing plantingas ontological argument for god. Whether youve loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. Pentru traducere automata, fa click aici romanian dr.
Maydole ontological arguments are deductive arguments for the existence of god from general. Historically, however, the term is inextricably associated with the famous argument presented in anselms proslogion chapter ii, and with. Plantingas argument centres on his conclusion that naturalism and the theory of evolution ne are rationally incompatible because they gives rise to significant doubts about the reliability of our cognitive faculties beilby 2002 pp. The exam expects you to reflect on the challenges to the ontological argument do they refute it or does the argument still persuade.
Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. For, in my judgment, there is no presentation of the ontological argument that is as carefully developed, forceful, and clear as plantingas formulation and discussion of the argument on 3 ibid. Anselm, rene descartes, and many other theologians throughout the centuries. Recently, plantinga has been interviewed by another notre dame philosopher with theistic leanings, gary gutting, for the new york times stone blog. People must learn to be satisfied in these areas of their life that. Humanities wp brp 68hum2014 this working paper is an output of a research project implemented at the national research university higher school of economics hse. Has plantinga buried mackies logical argument from evil. In this series refuting iron chariots we observe the fallacious attempted counterarguments to theistic arguments, made on the atheist website, ironchariots. Alvin carl plantinga born november 15, 1932 is an american philosopher and holder of the jellema chair in philosophy at calvin college. This book discusses and exemplifies the philosophy of religion, or philosophical reflection on central. The ontological argument the ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god, coming in many forms. They try to gain objective meaning from an entirely subjective word, and fail because of it. I took it that these arguments are successful only if they start from propositions that compel assent from every honest and intelligent person and proceed majestically to their conclusion by way of forms of argument.
This is an a prioriargument for the existence of god. Arguments that prove the existence of god ukessays. Anselm claims that we can prove the existence of god, without any evidence from experience, simply by understanding the conceptof god. Anselm to contemporary philosophers alvin plantinga, richard taylor on. The first ontological argument in the western christian tradition 1 was proposed by anselm of canterbury in his 1078 work proslogion. Plantingas defence of the ontological argument michael tooley in chapter io of his book, the nature of necessity, alvin plantinga contends that although many versions of the ontological argument are unsound, there is at least one that is valid, and. Given the evil that results from creating creatures with free will, even if it is unavoidable in producing good, why does god create the world and free agents at all. No philosophical argument for the existence of god, can be initiated with a definition of god, because god is not within human experience. The following video explains alvin plantinga s modal ontological argument where the word modal refers to notions of possibility. Refuting plantingas victorious ontological argument the. Most forms of the ontological argument rely on the premise that existence is greater than nonexistence, or that necessary existence is greater than conditional existence. Anselm defined god as a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists 2, and argued that this being must exist in the mind, even in the mind of the person who denies the existence of god. Plantinga and taylor did a fine job compiling parts of famous philosophical works that.
In evaluating these arguments i employed a traditional but wholly improper standard. That is, for example, belief in krishna may be properly basic for some hindus given the right conditions. He is known for his work in philosophy of religion, epistemology, metaphysics and christian apologetics quotes. Nov 15, 2010 critically evaluate plantingas view that kants objection to anselms ontological argument is irrelevant. Evolutionary argument against naturalism wikipedia. In his discussion of philosophical trends in europe, colin brown notes of anselms ontological argument, to make the argument work, existence has to be treated as a quality. I will then go on to look at criticisms of the argument from both gaunilo and kant to see if they can show that the argument does not work and if not, why not. Alvin plantinga, professor of philosophy at notre dame, is an expert in this. Carmona as sort of a reply to the article i posted earlier, i have decided to present chapter 4 of my book philosophical atheism in full. Contemporary defenders of the ontological argument include alvin plantinga, william alston.
A more recent ontological argument came from kurt godel, who proposed a formal argument for gods existence. This argument for the existence of god has fascinated philosophers ever since anselm first stated it. Something is supreme if and only if nothing is possibly greater, and a perfection is a property that it is better to have than not. Plantinga s defence of the ontological argument michael tooley in chapter io of his book, the nature of necessity, alvin plantinga contends that although many versions of the ontological argument are unsound, there is at least one that is valid, and whose premises may reasonably be accepted. Plantinga has been one of the principal figures involved in the attempt to clarify and understand the metaphysics of possible worlds. Download pdf where the conflict really lies book full free. Refuting plantingas victorious ontological argument. William lane craig considers alvin plantinga s version of the ontological argument as having the best chance of being cogent wlc 2004, p. Jan 17, 2009 on plantingas ontological argument by darrin at 1172009 one of the most curious arguments for the existence of god has been presented by st. For, in my judgment, there is no presentation of the ontological argument that is as carefully developed, forceful, and clear as plantinga s formulation and discussion of the argument on 3 ibid.
Plantinga concludes that the ontological argument shows that belief in god isnt contrary to reason irrational, deluded, foolish and he thinks this is enough. My chief aim in this chapter is to logically evaluate logical reconstructions of each of these six. Nov 11, 2017 far from victorious, plantingas argument would taste irreparable defeat and this, in more ways than one. In this essay i shall describe anselms ontological argument and look at how it may prove gods existence. So, for example, there is a possible world in which i am able to execute dazzling slam dunks and a possible world in which i am lucky to make a basket at all. What was particularly intetesting was seeing alvin plantinga s rebuttal of the argument he would later come to support, although only after tweaking it which i think has really transormed it and is the most convincing form of it that ive ever read. However, plantingas version seems to avoid this it doesnt, though. Alvin plantinga quotes author of god, freedom, and evil. On plantingas ontological argument by darrin at 1172009 one of the most curious arguments for the existence of god has been presented by st. I shall only defend the modal version of the argument as offered by plantinga. In this essay it shall be discussed whether there are any arguments which work to prove the existence of god. No philosophical argument for the existence of god, can be initiated with a definition of god.
For a critical account of verificationism see plantinga, god and other minds. It also makes use of the clause in nagasawas article, namely that since. Aug 04, 2015 a video response to inspiringphilosphy and anticitizenx regarding alvin plantingas modal ontological argument for gods existence. In god and other minds, i argued first that the theistic proofs or arguments do not succeed. Anselms a prioriargument for the existence of god today we will look at anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. He is known for his work in philosophy of religion, epistemology, metaphysics and christian apologetics. What is the best refutation of plantingas modal ontological. Plantingas version of the ontological argument is seen as the most updated and formidable. The ontological argument peter millican any argument which attempts to prove gods existence a priori based only on his nature can be termed an ontological argument. I introduce a plausible interpretation of the ontological argument that is not vulnerable to millicans objection and conclude that even if the ontological argument fails, it does not fail in the. Is the modal ontological argument for god a sound proof.
I then argued that the objections to theistic belief are equally unimpressive. Where the conflict really lies available for download and read online in other formats. Then again, whenever gutting veers close to theism i have no problem taking him to task either. While plantinga maintains that belief in the great pumpkin cannot have adequate grounds, he does believe that any belief in god could have grounds. Norman malcolm revived the ontological argument in 1960 when he located a second, stronger ontological argument in anselms work. Suppose we concede that if i had been born of muslim parents in morocco rather than christian parents in michigan, my beliefs would be quite different. It is really just the assertion that a maximally great being is not possible, and thus merely an assertion to the effect that plantingas first and key premise is false. God, freedom, and evil alvin plantinga free download as pdf file. Alvin plantinga on theistic arguments warranted christian belief, new york. Sep 17, 2014 unfortunately, this reformulation of the ontological argument implies the existence of possible beings which do not exist. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books youve read. What was particularly intetesting was seeing alvin plantingas rebuttal of the argument he would later come to support, although only after tweaking it which i think has really transormed it and is the most convincing form of it that ive ever read. Text burns, patching plantingas ontological argument by making the murdoch move. Here, plantinga attempted to use the philosophical concept of possible worlds to show the necessary nature of gods existence.
In other words, ontological arguments are arguments from what are typically alleged to be none but analytic, a priori and necessary premises to the. Download free alvin plantinga book in pdf and epub free download. Plantingas argument, and others like it, always lead me to a related question. Philosophy genius editors the ontological argument for the. Robert maydole, the modal perfection argument for the. I often enjoy guttings columns, for instance his argument for why the pope should revisit the catholics church position on abortion.
William lane craig considers alvin plantingas version of the ontological argument as having the best chance of being cogent wlc 2004, p. The relevance of kants objection to anselms ontological argument. But the nomaximality premise of the rival to plantingas ontological argument seems in no relevant way different from nu. While plantinga maintains that belief in the great pumpkin. Basically, i enumerate numerous objections i have thought of. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses.
553 964 647 849 1121 305 703 928 395 1325 389 55 1466 931 19 1176 1282 196 671 969 1037 882 943 917 252 1491 544 926 1101 461 330